Create an account

Very important

  • To access the important data of the forums, you must be active in each forum and especially in the leaks and database leaks section, send data and after sending the data and activity, data and important content will be opened and visible for you.
  • You will only see chat messages from people who are at or below your level.
  • More than 500,000 database leaks and millions of account leaks are waiting for you, so access and view with more activity.
  • Many important data are inactive and inaccessible for you, so open them with activity. (This will be done automatically)


Thread Rating:
  • 599 Vote(s) - 3.56 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Integration Testing POSTing an entire object to Spring MVC controller

#1
Is there a way to pass an entire form object on mock request when integration testing a spring mvc web app? All I can find is to pass each field separately as a param like this:

mockMvc.perform(post("/somehwere/new").param("items[0].value","value"));

Which is fine for small forms. But what if my posted object gets larger? Also it makes the test code look nicer if I can just post an entire object.

Specifically I'd like to test the selection of multiple items by checkbox and then posting them. Of course I could just test posting a single item, but I was wondering..

We're using spring 3.2.2 with the spring-test-mvc included.

My Model for the form looks something like this:

NewObject {
List<Item> selection;
}


I've tried calls like this:

mockMvc.perform(post("/somehwere/new").requestAttr("newObject", newObject)

to a Controller like this:

@Controller
@RequestMapping(value = "/somewhere/new")
public class SomewhereController {

@RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.POST)
public String post(
@ModelAttribute("newObject") NewObject newObject) {
// ...
}

But the object will be empty (yes I've filled it before in the test)

The only working solution I found was using @SessionAttribute like this:
[Integration Testing of Spring MVC Applications: Forms][1]

But I dislike the idea of having to remember to call complete at the end of every controller where I need this. After all the form data does not have to be inside the session, I only need it for the one request.

So the only thing I can think of right now is to write some Util class that uses the MockHttpServletRequestBuilder to append all the object fields as .param using reflections or individually for each test case..

I don't know, feeld un-intuitive..

Any thoughts / ideas on how I might make my like easier? (Apart from just calling the controller directly)

Thanks!


[1]:

[To see links please register here]

Reply

#2
One of the main purposes of integration testing with `MockMvc` is to verify that model objects are correclty populated with form data.

In order to do it you have to pass form data as they're passed from actual form (using `.param()`). If you use some automatic conversion from `NewObject` to from data, your test won't cover particular class of possible problems (modifications of `NewObject` incompatible with actual form).
Reply

#3
I ran into the same issue a while ago and did solve it by using reflection with some help from [Jackson][1].

First populate a map with all the fields on an Object. Then add those map entries as parameters to the MockHttpServletRequestBuilder.

In this way you can use any Object and you are passing it as request parameters. I'm sure there are other solutions out there but this one worked for us:

@Test
public void testFormEdit() throws Exception {
getMockMvc()
.perform(
addFormParameters(post(servletPath + tableRootUrl + "/" + POST_FORM_EDIT_URL).servletPath(servletPath)
.param("entityID", entityId), validEntity)).andDo(print()).andExpect(status().isOk())
.andExpect(content().contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)).andExpect(content().string(equalTo(entityId)));
}

private MockHttpServletRequestBuilder addFormParameters(MockHttpServletRequestBuilder builder, Object object)
throws IllegalAccessException, InvocationTargetException, NoSuchMethodException {

SimpleDateFormat dateFormat = new SimpleDateFormat(applicationSettings.getApplicationDateFormat());

Map<String, ?> propertyValues = getPropertyValues(object, dateFormat);

for (Entry<String, ?> entry : propertyValues.entrySet()) {
builder.param(entry.getKey(),
Util.prepareDisplayValue(entry.getValue(), applicationSettings.getApplicationDateFormat()));
}

return builder;
}

private Map<String, ?> getPropertyValues(Object object, DateFormat dateFormat) {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.setDateFormat(dateFormat);
mapper.setSerializationInclusion(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL);
mapper.registerModule(new JodaModule());

TypeReference<HashMap<String, ?>> typeRef = new TypeReference<HashMap<String, ?>>() {};

Map<String, ?> returnValues = mapper.convertValue(object, typeRef);

return returnValues;

}

[1]:

[To see links please register here]

Reply

#4
Another way to solve with Reflection, but without marshalling:

I have this abstract helper class:

public abstract class MvcIntegrationTestUtils {

public static MockHttpServletRequestBuilder postForm(String url,
Object modelAttribute, String... propertyPaths) {

try {
MockHttpServletRequestBuilder form = post(url).characterEncoding(
"UTF-8").contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED);

for (String path : propertyPaths) {
form.param(path, BeanUtils.getProperty(modelAttribute, path));
}

return form;

} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
}

You use it like this:

// static import (optional)
import static org.springframework.test.web.servlet.result.MockMvcResultMatchers.*;

// in your test method, populate your model attribute object (yes, works with nested properties)
BlogSetup bgs = new BlogSetup();
bgs.getBlog().setBlogTitle("Test Blog");
bgs.getUser().setEmail("[email protected]");
bgs.getUser().setFirstName("Administrator");
bgs.getUser().setLastName("Localhost");
bgs.getUser().setPassword("password");

// finally put it together
mockMvc.perform(
postForm("/blogs/create", bgs, "blog.blogTitle", "user.email",
"user.firstName", "user.lastName", "user.password"))
.andExpect(status().isOk())


I have deduced it is better to be able to mention the property paths when building the form, since I need to vary that in my tests. For example, I might want to check if I get a validation error on a missing input and I'll leave out the property path to simulate the condition. I also find it easier to build my model attributes in a @Before method.

The BeanUtils is from commons-beanutils:

<dependency>
<groupId>commons-beanutils</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-beanutils</artifactId>
<version>1.8.3</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
Reply

#5
Here is the method I made to transform recursively the fields of an object in a map ready to be used with a `MockHttpServletRequestBuilder`

public static void objectToPostParams(final String key, final Object value, final Map<String, String> map) throws IllegalAccessException {
if ((value instanceof Number) || (value instanceof Enum) || (value instanceof String)) {
map.put(key, value.toString());
} else if (value instanceof Date) {
map.put(key, new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm").format((Date) value));
} else if (value instanceof GenericDTO) {
final Map<String, Object> fieldsMap = ReflectionUtils.getFieldsMap((GenericDTO) value);
for (final Entry<String, Object> entry : fieldsMap.entrySet()) {
final StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
if (!GenericValidator.isEmpty(key)) {
sb.append(key).append('.');
}
sb.append(entry.getKey());
objectToPostParams(sb.toString(), entry.getValue(), map);
}
} else if (value instanceof List) {
for (int i = 0; i < ((List) value).size(); i++) {
objectToPostParams(key + '[' + i + ']', ((List) value).get(i), map);
}
}
}

`GenericDTO` is a simple class extending `Serializable`

public interface GenericDTO extends Serializable {}

and here is the `ReflectionUtils` class

public final class ReflectionUtils {
public static List<Field> getAllFields(final List<Field> fields, final Class<?> type) {
if (type.getSuperclass() != null) {
getAllFields(fields, type.getSuperclass());
}
// if a field is overwritten in the child class, the one in the parent is removed
fields.addAll(Arrays.asList(type.getDeclaredFields()).stream().map(field -> {
final Iterator<Field> iterator = fields.iterator();
while(iterator.hasNext()){
final Field fieldTmp = iterator.next();
if (fieldTmp.getName().equals(field.getName())) {
iterator.remove();
break;
}
}
return field;
}).collect(Collectors.toList()));
return fields;
}

public static Map<String, Object> getFieldsMap(final GenericDTO genericDTO) throws IllegalAccessException {
final Map<String, Object> map = new HashMap<>();
final List<Field> fields = new ArrayList<>();
getAllFields(fields, genericDTO.getClass());
for (final Field field : fields) {
final boolean isFieldAccessible = field.isAccessible();
field.setAccessible(true);
map.put(field.getName(), field.get(genericDTO));
field.setAccessible(isFieldAccessible);
}
return map;
}
}

You can use it like

final MockHttpServletRequestBuilder post = post("/");
final Map<String, String> map = new TreeMap<>();
objectToPostParams("", genericDTO, map);
for (final Entry<String, String> entry : map.entrySet()) {
post.param(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
}

I didn't tested it extensively, but it seems to work.
Reply

#6
I believe that I have the simplest answer yet using Spring Boot 1.4, included imports for the test class.:

public class SomeClass { /// this goes in it's own file
//// fields go here
}

import org.junit.Before
import org.junit.Test
import org.junit.runner.RunWith
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired
import org.springframework.boot.test.autoconfigure.web.servlet.WebMvcTest
import org.springframework.http.MediaType
import org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringRunner
import org.springframework.test.web.servlet.MockMvc

import static org.springframework.test.web.servlet.request.MockMvcRequestBuilders.post
import static org.springframework.test.web.servlet.result.MockMvcResultMatchers.status

@RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
@WebMvcTest(SomeController.class)
public class ControllerTest {

@Autowired private MockMvc mvc;
@Autowired private ObjectMapper mapper;

private SomeClass someClass; //this could be Autowired
//, initialized in the test method
//, or created in setup block
@Before
public void setup() {
someClass = new SomeClass();
}

@Test
public void postTest() {
String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(someClass);
mvc.perform(post("/someControllerUrl")
.contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.content(json)
.accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON))
.andExpect(status().isOk());
}

}
Reply

#7
I had the same question and it turned out the solution was fairly simple, by using JSON marshaller.
Having your controller just change the signature by changing `@ModelAttribute("newObject")` to `@RequestBody`. Like this:

@Controller
@RequestMapping(value = "/somewhere/new")
public class SomewhereController {

@RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.POST)
public String post(@RequestBody NewObject newObject) {
// ...
}
}

Then in your tests you can simply say:

NewObject newObjectInstance = new NewObject();
// setting fields for the NewObject

mockMvc.perform(MockMvcRequestBuilders.post(uri)
.content(asJsonString(newObjectInstance))
.contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON));

Where the `asJsonString` method is just:

public static String asJsonString(final Object obj) {
try {
final ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
final String jsonContent = mapper.writeValueAsString(obj);
return jsonContent;
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
Reply

#8
I think most of these solutions are far too complicated.
I assume that in your test controller you have this

@Autowired
private ObjectMapper objectMapper;

**If its a rest service**

@Test
public void test() throws Exception {
mockMvc.perform(post("/person"))
.contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.content(objectMapper.writeValueAsString(new Person()))
...etc
}


**For spring mvc using a posted form** I came up with this solution. (Not really sure if its a good idea yet)


private MultiValueMap<String, String> toFormParams(Object o, Set<String> excludeFields) throws Exception {
ObjectReader reader = objectMapper.readerFor(Map.class);
Map<String, String> map = reader.readValue(objectMapper.writeValueAsString(o));

MultiValueMap<String, String> multiValueMap = new LinkedMultiValueMap<>();
map.entrySet().stream()
.filter(e -> !excludeFields.contains(e.getKey()))
.forEach(e -> multiValueMap.add(e.getKey(), (e.getValue() == null ? "" : e.getValue())));
return multiValueMap;
}



@Test
public void test() throws Exception {
MultiValueMap<String, String> formParams = toFormParams(new Phone(),
Set.of("id", "created"));

mockMvc.perform(post("/person"))
.contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED)
.params(formParams))
...etc
}


The basic idea is to
- first convert object to json string to get all the field names easily
- convert this json string into a map and dump it into a `MultiValueMap` that spring expects. Optionally filter out any fields you dont want to include (Or you could just annotate fields with `@JsonIgnore` to avoid this extra step)







Reply

#9
Next construction helped me to solve issue and send whole object:
```
post(BASE_URL)
.flashAttr("attr_wrapper", wrapper) // 'flashAttr' helped to add whole object to request
```
My method from controller:
```
public String updateConfiguration(
@ModelAttribute("attr_wrapper") Wrapper wrapper) { // don't forget to add name like 'attr_wrapper'
}
```
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

©0Day  2016 - 2023 | All Rights Reserved.  Made with    for the community. Connected through