Create an account

Very important

  • To access the important data of the forums, you must be active in each forum and especially in the leaks and database leaks section, send data and after sending the data and activity, data and important content will be opened and visible for you.
  • You will only see chat messages from people who are at or below your level.
  • More than 500,000 database leaks and millions of account leaks are waiting for you, so access and view with more activity.
  • Many important data are inactive and inaccessible for you, so open them with activity. (This will be done automatically)


Thread Rating:
  • 550 Vote(s) - 3.45 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Noop for Swift's Exhaustive Switch Statements

#1
Swift requires exhaustive switch statements, and that each case have executable code.

> 'case' label in a 'switch' should have at least one executable statement

Has anybody settled on a good way to handle the cases where you don't want to actually do anything? I can put a println() in there, but that feels dirty.
Reply

#2
A clean solution I use for my default case is:

default: ()
Reply

#3
You can check specific case, no need to be `exhustive` with `switch` `case`s


Say you have a enum like this,

enum Selection {
case one
case two
case three
}
var myCase = Selection.one


you can check like this,
```swift
if case .one = myCase {
print("one")
}
```
Reply

#4
Do nothing in exhaustive switch case statements:

Swift:

switch yourVariable {
case .someCase:
break
}

SwiftUI:

switch yourVariable {
case .someCase:
EmptyView() // break does not work with ViewBuilder
}

Using EmptyView() instead of break in SwiftUI views prevents the error:

> Closure containing control flow statement cannot be used with function
> builder ViewBuilder.

EmptyView() is a SwiftUI standard view (tested with Xcode 12, iOS 14) and does not need to be defined yourself.
Reply

#5
In addition to `break` mentioned in other answers, I have also seen `()` used as a no-op statement:

switch 0 == 1 {
case true:
break
case false:
()
}

Use `()` if you find `break` confusing or want to save 3 characters.
Reply

#6
You can use a `break` statement:

let vegetable = "red pepper"
var vegetableComment: String = "Nothing"
switch vegetable {
case "cucumber", "watercress":
break // does nothing
case let x where x.hasSuffix("pepper"):
vegetableComment = "Is it a spicy \(x)?"
default:
vegetableComment = "Everything tastes good in soup."
}

Example modified from the [docs][1]


[1]:

[To see links please register here]

Reply

#7
The cleanest solution I've found is to simply include your last statement in the switch case as your default. This avoids the need to add `break` or other unnecessary statements while still covering all possible cases.

For example:

```swift
switch myVar {

case 0:
myOtherVar = "Red"

case 1:
myOtherVar = "Blue"

default:
myOtherVar = "Green"

}
```
Reply

#8
Below is one option for null statement, but maybe not a good solution. I cannot find a statement like python pass

{}()

for switch case, break is better choice.

break
Reply

#9
According to [the book][1], you need to use `break` there:

> The scope of each case can’t be empty. As a result, you must include at least one statement following the colon (:) of each case label. Use a single `break` statement if you don’t intend to execute any code in the body of a matched case.

[1]:

[To see links please register here]

Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

©0Day  2016 - 2023 | All Rights Reserved.  Made with    for the community. Connected through