[Release] MuchNTP - DOS with NTP amplification

I recently stumbled over a very well written

[To see links please register here]

by

[To see links please register here]

that explains NTP amplification, however, I was sad to see that that there was no script for python 3.x that utilized it. So, I cranked this piece of shit out in a few hours, ta-da!

Hidden Content

You must

[To see links please register here]

or

[To see links please register here]

to view this content.

Vulnerable NTP servers must be stored in a text file in the same directory as the script.
Each server must be on a separate line.
You need admin privileges to run the script.
My script does not check to see if the server is vulnerable.

Comments, criticism, feedback ect.

P.S.
Why am I not allowed to attach files with a .py extension?

Good job on the script, glad you thought my tutorial was useful :smile:.

(03-14-2014, 05:28 AM)Cipher Wrote:

[To see links please register here]

Good job on the script, glad you thought my tutorial was useful :smile:.

Thanks :tongue:, it was an interesting one for sure, I've never built packets from the ground-up like this before.

Good job on the script, glad you thought my tutorial was useful :smile:.

(03-14-2014, 05:28 AM)Cipher Wrote:

[To see links please register here]

Good job on the script, glad you thought my tutorial was useful :smile:.

Thanks :tongue:, it was an interesting one for sure, I've never built packets from the ground-up like this before.

Looks really good mate. I actually might look into NTP amplification now.

Looks really good mate. I actually might look into NTP amplification now.

1. You don't need to comment everything you do. No comments is better than overcommenting.

2. You definitely do not need a class for this.

1. You don't need to comment everything you do. No comments is better than overcommenting.

2. You definitely do not need a class for this.

(03-15-2014, 12:15 AM)w00t Wrote:

[To see links please register here]

1. You don't need to comment everything you do. No comments is better than overcommenting.

2. You definitely do not need a class for this.

1. I beg to differ.

2. If you want it to be a linear script, I'm disinclined for the following reason: multiprocessing necessitates the use of at least one function, additionally, I have a checksum function that only needs to be used when constructing packets. Having only 2 functions would be all well and good, but I originally intended to create a GUI for the script (still do, at some point...), so you might see how having
GUI <--> process manager class <--> spammer process
might be more organized.

Also, congrats on S elite