08-02-2023, 12:53 PM
As per Spring [documentation](
the steps to use Spring JdbcTemplate is as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"
xsi:schemaLocation="
<!-- Scans within the base package of the application for @Components to configure as beans -->
<context:component-scan base-package="org.springframework.docs.test" />
<bean id="dataSource" class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource" destroy-method="close">
<property name="driverClassName" value="${jdbc.driverClassName}"/>
<property name="url" value="${jdbc.url}"/>
<property name="username" value="${jdbc.username}"/>
<property name="password" value="${jdbc.password}"/>
</bean>
<context:property-placeholder location="jdbc.properties"/>
</beans>
And then,
@Repository
public class JdbcCorporateEventDao implements CorporateEventDao {
private JdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate;
@Autowired
public void setDataSource(DataSource dataSource) {
this.jdbcTemplate = new JdbcTemplate(dataSource);
}
// JDBC-backed implementations of the methods on the CorporateEventDao follow...
}
Basically, the JdbcTemplate is created inside the Component class using the setter for datasource.
Is there anything wrong with doing it this way instead so that there is exactly ONE instance of jdbcTemplate in the application?
<bean id="jdbcTemplate" class="org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate"
p:dataSource-ref="dataSource"
/>
And then injecting the jdbcTemplate itself directly into the Component
@Repository
public class JdbcCorporateEventDao implements CorporateEventDao {
@Resource("jdbcTemplate")
private JdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate;
// JDBC-backed implementations of the methods on the CorporateEventDao follow...
}
Is there a reason why the jdbcTemplate itself must not be injected into the component class directly?
SGB
[To see links please register here]
),the steps to use Spring JdbcTemplate is as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"
xsi:schemaLocation="
[To see links please register here]
[To see links please register here]
[To see links please register here]
[To see links please register here]
;<!-- Scans within the base package of the application for @Components to configure as beans -->
<context:component-scan base-package="org.springframework.docs.test" />
<bean id="dataSource" class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource" destroy-method="close">
<property name="driverClassName" value="${jdbc.driverClassName}"/>
<property name="url" value="${jdbc.url}"/>
<property name="username" value="${jdbc.username}"/>
<property name="password" value="${jdbc.password}"/>
</bean>
<context:property-placeholder location="jdbc.properties"/>
</beans>
And then,
@Repository
public class JdbcCorporateEventDao implements CorporateEventDao {
private JdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate;
@Autowired
public void setDataSource(DataSource dataSource) {
this.jdbcTemplate = new JdbcTemplate(dataSource);
}
// JDBC-backed implementations of the methods on the CorporateEventDao follow...
}
Basically, the JdbcTemplate is created inside the Component class using the setter for datasource.
Is there anything wrong with doing it this way instead so that there is exactly ONE instance of jdbcTemplate in the application?
<bean id="jdbcTemplate" class="org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate"
p:dataSource-ref="dataSource"
/>
And then injecting the jdbcTemplate itself directly into the Component
@Repository
public class JdbcCorporateEventDao implements CorporateEventDao {
@Resource("jdbcTemplate")
private JdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate;
// JDBC-backed implementations of the methods on the CorporateEventDao follow...
}
Is there a reason why the jdbcTemplate itself must not be injected into the component class directly?
SGB